> The web as
subsumed all of this, in an inferior fashion, IMHO.
Yeah, but I think of the things I used to easily
find with archie and
now I can't find them at all with google even with targetted searches
for specific filenames.
Google doesn't spider for filenames, just content. If a list of filenames
doesn't show up on a web page, Google won't see it.
It's why I've mentioned a few times that I think some sort of mechanism to
share "who has what" for the vintage community - tailored for our specific
needs - would be nice. That way someone searching for content only needs to
find a site participating in the scheme, and then it can use *its* search
mechanism to find information.
Rather than some process trying to guess what information makes up a page (as
with Google), I'd see it more that people with participating sites would
explicitly publish what they had available so share - at least giving control
over what could appear in search results.
Kind of like manx - but with the interface side distributable across multiple
sites (plus I can never remember if the data for manx is driven by the
"owners" of the content or by people entering info when they happen to stumble
across something)