17 May
2002
17 May
'02
3:10 a.m.
There's a good point to be made here, i.e. we can learn from what problems and
solutions participants in the "ancient computers" game encounter, irrespective
of the focus of their interests.
Of course, you CAN search the archive later, I guess. It's happened more than
once that I've seen a solution to a problem similar to my own, that I wouldn't
have seen if my reading had been so provincially based as to filter out
systems of one sort or another.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [CCTALK] Subdivide further Jay
> I've long thought that CC should be
subdivided into micros and minis.
> I imagine many scroll down the messages and delete anything related to
> DEC PDP, VAX, and any other mini stuff like I do, and I'm sure the mini
and
big iron
people do the same.
Well, as one of those 'mini and big iron people', I'd have to disagree.
I've got both micros and bigger systems, while I no longer find time to do
anything with my classic micros, and I'm finding it hard enough to work on
my DEC gear, as well as finding hard to keep up with the list, I tend to
read a fair amount of both types of posts.
Zane
_______________________________________________
cctalk mailing list
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk