Tony Duell wrote:
They can follow the
procedures in the servicce manual, but that's about all. Note I said 'by
no means all' -- I've met some repairers who really understand the
devices they work on.
Sounds like the guy we had out to deal with a startup error on our
digital printer (Fuji Frontier 570). Basically, the machine is a
combination of a modified laser printer and a normal 'wet' minilab print
processor -- RGB lasers "print" on the paper, then it's developed as
normal (develop, bleachfix, then a couple of wash tanks). We've been
having a few problems with it -- missing lines on the back-print, and
(more seriously) the machine not warming the tanks up on a morning. That
last one is pretty terminal -- it takes two hours to bring the tanks up
to ~45C (working temperature) from room temperature (!)
Anyway, the guy arrives and the first thing he asks:
"Have you got a copy of the service manual?"
As I see it, he had a laptop with him, and had no valid excuse for not
having a PDF of the S/M with him...
So he digs through our heavily annotated "operator-level service manual"
(which for >80% of the error messages lists "contact your technical
representative" as the only solution), umms and aahs a little, then asks
to borrow a screwdriver....
After about 45 minutes he's finally gained access to the machine, after
stripping one of the screws and losing another, and re-seats the loose
connector that's causing the error. The printer is duly powered up, and
it doesn't flag an error with the wiring.
I then pose a question.
"At the end of last week, we did the 6-monthly maintenance and scrubbed
the wash tanks out. It took three times the amount of stabiliser before
the level sensor picked up that there was actually something in the wash
tanks. Is that normal?"
I pointed out the bit in the maintenance manual regarding the wash tank
level sensors -- "If the concentration level is insufficient, then the
tank level sensors will not detect the wash fluid".
His response:
"Huh. I didn't know the level sensors depended on the concentration level."
I'm not complaining (because the machine is working to spec now, after
three engineer visits) but I seriously wondered if we'd been sent the
trainee, sans his mentor. I have no problem with his lack of experience
(everyone has to start somewhere) but not bringing even a basic toolkit
is pretty silly IMO. Even my rather hefty CK ratchet screwdriver is
small enough to put in even a small briefcase or backpack...
Anyway, I then feel that if they can do it, so can I.
Here, here!
In general older cameras are easier to work on then
new ones (electronic
control is right pain to repair!), and the better cameras are also much
easier to work on. I'd much rather strip a Leica than a Kodak -- parts
are better made, they fit easily, and so on.
Too true. There are a lot of Olympus OM4s that are starting to suffer
from ciruitry failure (read: metering and shutter times
go badly out of
spec, or the camera just up and dies) and you just can't get
new parts
for them any more.
There's something to be said for simple, all-mechanical designs.
The only Minoltas I've seriously been inside are
16mm sub-miniature ones.
And they seem pretty well put together.
From what I've been told, the quality took a nosedive in the
mid-90s/'00s span... same as most things, really.
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/