regarding the reply address on the list....

On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Bill Dawson wrote: I don't understand where this is coming from. The previous method enabled one to: a) reply to the list or b) reply to the sender only And again, why would one want to reply to both the sender AND the list? Assuming the sender is a member of the list (99% of the time they are) they are going to get the message anyway. I hate it when I get two replies to the same message because someone was too lazy to edit the headers of a poorly configured list. The benefits of a list like this is that it is a public forum; it's like a bunch of geeks in a big circle jabbering to each other. That's what gives this list its unique character and usefulness. Change it back. Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Looking for a six in a pile of nines... VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!! Stay tuned for more information or contact me to find out how you can participate http://www.vintage.org