8 Mar
2002
8 Mar
'02
2:29 a.m.
how about this: whoever's giving away the equipment can do it in whatever way
they damn well please? it's their stuff, after all... sheesh.
Ben Franchuk said:
"Jeffrey S. Sharp" wrote:
I think the best idea is to put a closing date on lists of items, this
way
both the seller and buyer have a idea of the time factor and slower
mails
can catch up. Anyhow the seller not the buyer has the final say in who
gets
the product. With some of the more valueable old equiment it is
important
that it goes to a good home not the first bidder.
PS. Does anybody know of a source of datasheets (PDF) online for the the
really old chips like RTL,DTL,74Hxx,74Lxx? You still can find the chips
but not the data.
--
Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
- Dan Wright
(dtwright(a)uiuc.edu)
(http://www.uiuc.edu/~dtwright)
-] ------------------------------ [-] -------------------------------- [-
``Weave a circle round him thrice, / And close your eyes with holy dread,
For he on honeydew hath fed, / and drunk the milk of Paradise.''
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Kubla Khan
I
can't say that I completely agree,,, Some people have jobs that don't
permit them to check their email more often,
There are also the best argument and lottery systems. Those options are
out there and have been used before. Mr. MacCorkle's request, I dare say,
is objectionable and would be unfair.