From: "Cini, Richard" <Richard.Cini at wachovia.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:54 AM
Yes, indeed IBM is a substantial company. But I'm
not buying an IBM PC
with
Linux installed -- I have an installed base of Windows PCs at home. I
wouldn't be buying it because I like Intel or the X86 architecture over
the
PPC architecture. I'm buying it because I'm tired of Windows.
I, like lots of others, get my Linux distributions through downloads from
Fedora, Mandrake, etc. yes, they're easier to install and configure than
before, but there's something about the slickness of OSX and the support
of
Apple that would make me switch.
I think I would be just as comfortable if I could purchase Linux from IBM
for a single desktop without having to buy it preinstalled on IBM
hardware.
Apple's product is more polished and has lots of well-integrated featured
that everyone in my family could love.
Maybe I'm uninformed, which is possible because I don't follow Linux too
closely.
However, this is all academic if they don't make a PC-compatible version
(which as previously noted != X86 version ).
Rich
<snip>
I agree that more competition for Micro$loth is good.
The biggest problem is that Apple has been kept alive by several factors two
of which are: $ from Willy boy and the simple fact they are not just
another PC running Windoze.
If they become just another PC will they lose a marketing base and how big a
base could they lose?
Randy
www.s100-manuals.com