29 Aug
2004
29 Aug
'04
12:12 p.m.
In message <200408292351.TAA02231(a)Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca> wrote:
So no-one saw the link I posted then?
It's listed as both a transistor (with a "CR" part designation, unlikely)
and
a rectifier diode - can't remember the specifics, but it was listed.
Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI
... "Bother", said Pooh, as he fell into the nitric acid bath
I don't know the SOT23 package. I do know I have
seen surface-mount
devices I would have no trouble believing capable of carrying five
amps. This is another reason I asked for pictures, if possible; if (as
I infer from your note) the SOT23 package is too small for it to
plausibly hold a five-amp device, that theory slips down the list.
A SOT23 is about the size of the body of a 1N914 or 1N4148 diode :)
More like the
'5A' is a code for the diode type.
That's one plausible other theory I have, too. A third is that the
device is something more like a voltage regulator and the CR
designation on the board does not indicate a rectifier, but instead,
perhaps, a parts-list code, or maybe refers to some other device, or
whatnot. Another reason to want pictures: to estimate how plausible
some of those theories are.