17 May
1997
17 May
'97
4:47 p.m.
On Sat, 17 May 1997, Captain Napalm wrote:
Yeah, it was a version less than 1.00. I haven't played with Linux for a
while and didn't know that the kernal has fattened up since 1.0. I guess
I better stop bragging to people that I can run linux in less than 4
megabytes.
The Apple ][ was an incredible machine. One beautiful hack on top of
the next.
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
I used to run
my linux box on 4megs. Worked fine (with a decent swap
space). There's no need for the bloat which windows and its ilk covets.
What next? A 500meg operating system?
Which version of Linux were you running? Sounds like either the 0.9x
series or maybe the 1.0 series. I would be slighty hesitent to run 1.2 in
4M and 2.0 in 8M (2.0 really bloated up). The Apple disk
conrtoller ROM which read the boot sector off of a disk
was 256 bytes! Amazing piece of code. You won't find anything
comparable today, at least in any mainstream software (ie. windows).
I've heard incredible things about the Apple ][ Disk drive. One, that it
took only 5 ICs for the hardware, and now only 256 bytes of code to read
from it? I'd really like to see both the schematics and the code. That's
just incredible.