What memories that brings back. I worked in chatsworth at Pertec on them
tape drives as a Tech on the assembly line.
they were a pain in the butt to make work perfectly. Glad them tape
drive days are over.
On 6/10/2015 12:34 AM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
I was looking at a couple of documents describing the
Pertec tape interface; the manual for my Kennedy 9610 tape drive, and a nice reference by
a fellow with a rather familiar name:
http://www.sydex.com/pertec.html
According to my Kennedy manual, issuing a read command causes the drive to return one
block of data. I can see how that would be used in block-oriented applications in which
blocks may be randomly read, written and re-written on the tape. But most of my magtape
experience has been using the tapes in a streaming mode, such as when reading/writing one
or more tar archives separated by file marks.
When writing a tar archive on a magtape from a Unix system, is the archive written as a
sequence of fixed-size blocks? Or is the entire tar archive effectively written as one
continuous block which must be streamed with no repositioning?
I'm curious because I'm daydreaming about how to build a tape drive interface
controller, and I wonder whether it might need to potentially stream an entire tape in one
go vs. being able to safely assume some maximal block size.
--
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized
use,
copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited
by
the sender and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender
immediately and delete this e-mail.