21 Jul
2019
21 Jul
'19
2:48 p.m.
On 7/21/2019 4:16 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk wrote:
I'd suggest that in 2019 when bits are cheap and
high-quality scanners
nearly as cheap, "crappy quality digital image" is a bit of a straw man.
Yes, I've seen plenty of barely-readable or practically unreadable scans,
but they were made years or decades ago.
What dpi qualifies as not "crappy"? 300dpi? 400? 600?
It is not the DPI
that is problem on some scans, but they used
a LOSSY format to store the data. JPEG IS NO!
Ben.