On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:43:45PM -0800, Chuck Guzis wrote:
But a 68K is a whole lot more CPU than an 8086. One
might even argue
that it's more CPU than a 286.
I would, but then I've programmed the 68000 and the 286 in assembler,
professionally.
To hammer this back to the portable serial terminal thread, a 68K-based
terminal would be *great*, but unless you wanted to get into graphical
emulation (Tektronix, GraphOn, VT240...), overkill for the original
scope. I'm personally very fond of the 68000, and have tubes and
tubes of the 64-pin DIP variety on the shelf and lots of hardware
trace and debugging tools, but compared to an 8051 or a Z-80 or
6502 design, not cost effective.
It would be a fun little box, though... and difficult to avoid
serious feature creep into a 16/32-bit Micro.
-ethan
--
Ethan Dicks, A-333-S Current South Pole Weather at 7-Nov-2007 at 21:20 Z
South Pole Station
PSC 468 Box 400 Temp -54.8 F (-48.2 C) Windchill -79.1 F (-61.7 C)
APO AP 96598 Wind 6.1 kts Grid 325 Barometer 685.7 mb (10414 ft)
Ethan.Dicks at
usap.gov http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html