On 04/29/2012 02:41 PM, ben wrote:
On 4/29/2012 12:25 PM, TeoZ wrote:
>
> Home computing never took off until the software industry exploded.
> There are tons of computer models like the ADAM and my Timex 2068 that
> never went anywhere because there was little software available for the
> masses. Plenty of people had computers before the 80's, they just tended
> to write their own software as needed.
Not quite true or complete. Text editors, Spreadsheets, and databases
started to
appear before 1978 for many of the machines. The problem was mostly mass
storage as cassette tape had one problem, it was not random access nor
block replaceable. Back in 1978 a new car was about $5K and a floppy with
controller was around 700-2000 bucks (1978-dollars). I even took a Data
Structures class at the college and challened the fact that my NS*
horizon was
with floppy and running UCSD Pascal P-system in early '79 with an Heath
H19 terminal with a screen oriented editor. The rest of the class was still
punching cards on an 029 doe a Univac-1108. I may have been bleeding
edge but not by much.
In early 1979 a Northstar* Horizon with enough ram and disk to run P-system
was about $2500.
What made home computing take off was the cost, software and packaged
systems ready to go. The bigger S100 houses, Apple, TRS80, Commodore
were very quick to understand that and had success.
The rest really did exist int he realm of games and entry level toys.
Games were
a successful space but one that was very dynamic and tended to push Moore's
law to the limit.
I tend to think the lack of floppy disk with a real
OS , killed the
8 bitters
out there.
I find that a rather irrational statement. I started running CPM in '77
with floppies.
I considered then as now that mass storage is an element in the chain to
making
and compute engine go from a controller level to a flexible system.
What happened
in the mid 80s was the realization that the software in place was
getting bigger
and the problems people wanted to solve (databases and spreadsheets) were
growing and floppies were inadequate storage and 64K of ram didn't fit
it all
without awkward overlays and all.
I was just looking at some old mags from the
80's,PC DOS and
CP/M was it for general purpose OS's. I wanted to get a 6809 machine
back then, but I could not find software to with the hardware.
Ben.
Sudden realization that by the 80s computing had been around a while?
It was. IBM was a legitimizer of something that was more than 5-6 years
old
by then and most of the software for it was lofted 8bit stuff. Reminder
why
was the upD78108 (V20) such a big deal, it executed 8080 code directly
and allowed a PC to run the already vast library of CP/M and other
8080 code. It didn't hurt that much of that code was freeware or
shareware.
I was interested in computers from very young as a child as they
were amazing machines. By time I'd seen some of the earlier machines
in the early to mid 60s I'd a rudimentary idea of what was inside and
how they worked. I wanted one!
Everything after that was mostly getting to be an engineer and one of
those computer for myself.. not in any particular order. As it worked out
I was in college when I was tasked with building a then very new 8008
running at a plodding 180khz or about 1khz/$. Everything after that
was cutting edge or close to it. As a result most of my collection are
machine I had or worked with from "back in the day". Those that
were not mine to keep were acquired again at later years as free
or cheap to fill the wish of having what I'd worked with.
Oh, and I"m still working with cool stuff. Just can't quit yet.
Allison
I