In message <000901bebda6$98d3c9f0$bb88e9cf(a)yamato.chipware.com>om>, "Bill
Sudbrink
" writes:
Ah yes. Active
use of Rax's theory in computing collecting. I
have multiple instances of empirical proof of it's validity.
Wonder what I would need to draw an Apple 1 to me.
WARNING! I have amassed a large body of data that shows
that this theory DOES NOT APPLY to Ohio Scientific products.
It also doesn't seem to apply to straight 8s. I've had a users
manual for one for years. (Snitched it from my parents attic
when I got into computers along with a price list dated a few
months before the machine was actually introduced.) The only
one I've even seen though belonged to DEC and was on display
at NCC'81. My new boss, though, did claim to know where a
couple of 8s might be, so hope springs eternal.
Brian L. Stuart