> I assumed that folk here would understand
"mask off"
> and come up with
> suitable methods.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Chris M wrote:
Yes. Just that I envisioned a typical 3.5" drive
and
it seemed a tad inconsistent to use the term w/it's
type of interface. I guess I was having a brain burp.
When I typed the response to Chuck's reply, I
remembered that an adapter would facilitate "masking
off" a particular pin.
I figured that it would be less irreversible than saying to break off that
pin!
But I just had din-din so I pormise to be much more
alert :)
plenty of lerts here