Tore Sinding Bekkedal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:45 +0000, Jules Richardson
wrote:
Personally I'm with Patrick on this one - I
find it annoying on lists that do
it because it pushes the meaningful subject line over more than it needs to
be, (even more so if people change subject lines when replying (e.g. "xxx
was: yyy" and don't bother to edit out the automatically-added text)
The single place where I've found this approach to have merit is in the
case of the Debian lists
I just had this discussion with a moderator of one of the freecycle lists,
where they do tag subject lines.
One interesting point he had was that it's useful in case the list address
ever changes - which isn't relevant here, but is perhaps a valid point for
mailing lists hosted with people such as Yahoo - who seem to have a habit of
dropping groups/lists with no warning to their members.
He did mention though that tagging subject lines was pretty much the norm back
in BITNET days (and also that VMS made it rather awkward to see message
headers other than the typical subject/date/sender) - so it's perhaps more
historically correct. Doesn't make it right, of course, but it's an
interesting observation :-)
cheers
Jules