23 Jul
2003
23 Jul
'03
10:36 p.m.
Ok somone out there must still have a copy of DOS 1.0. If so could you tell
us what the P/N of the set is? I could be wrong. I have been before. :)
Thanks,
Karl
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 15:49:29
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: dos 1.0
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Let me make this REAL clear. I've had both DOS 1.0 and 1.1 and they were
identical except for different disks and a paper sticker on the package
that said "DOS 1.1". I'm also fairly sure that there was no other mention
of hte DOs version anywhere else in the package except of the disks
themselves. I specificly checked the part number printed on the packages
and they were exactly the same. I didn't go through EVERY page in the
manual but the 20 or so pages that I checked, including the title page,
indexs, introduction, copyright, etc, were all exactly the same. I'm not
100% sure but I don't think either of them mentioned MS. I did see a LATER
DOs 1.1 package that had CHANGE pages added to it that was slightly
different. I don't remember if it had the same part number and paper
sticker or not.
Joe
At 02:09 PM 7/23/03 -0500, you wrote:
Joe, Not so. The DOS 1.0 manual has no reference to
Microsoft. The first
page of the manual of DOS 1.1 states Disk Operation System, by Microsoft.
The DOS 1.0 just states Disk Operation System. The part number is not the
same either.
Karl
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:00:22
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: dos 1.0
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
If you have a DOS 1.1 manual then you have a DOS 1.0 manual. I've had and
seen several DOS 1.0 and 1.1 packages and the only difference between the
manuals was that the DOS 1.1 manuals had a paper sticker on them that said
"DOS 1.1". Even the part number on them was the same.
Joe
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail