It's a toss between a few of them running 486DX2-66 and better, mostly the
Server 95-486, the 90 and 70. They all had a L2 cache option in various
configs making them way fastre than the SLC and non-cached versions.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Tothwolf
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:35 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Fwd: 2 IBM PS/2s, DC/MD area
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Russ Blakeman wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
Right, I didn't even think about the ISA
machines. I've seen so many
of the microchannel systems that I often forget about the others.
As I think about it, I might actually have several model 25s
instead of 50s. Guess I'll find out once I uncover them.
It's hard to confuse them. The 25 is an all-in-one. The easier ones
to confuse are the 30 and the 55SX, as they came in the same case.
The 35 and 56 also had similar cases despite one is ISA and one is
microchannel. The 60, 65 and 80 towers are very easy to mistake as the
only external difference is the logo plate.
I know I have 3 model 60 machines in various conditions. What was the
fastest 486 class microchannel machine that was made?
-Toth