On 08/23/2012 04:02 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
I must admit I was never a fan of CP/M.
I missed the CP/M boat by a couple of years - started out with home
computers where it was all BASIC and assembler, then straight to a DOS
machine. I have a feeling that CP/M would have driven me nuts if used 'in
anger' though.
Purely within a vintage context I like it though, it doesn't get in the way
of the bare metal much (and I've always been more of a hardware than
software person), but still provides some vaguely useful services on
otherwise-complicated machines.
My favourite CP/M box is, I think, the Epson QC10.
Interesting hardware
at least. A 7220 for graphics, those lovely voice-coil floppy drives, etc.
I have a QX-10 on the desk here beside me; it really is a lovely machine
(despite the plastic case; somehow I always think that 'real' computers
should have metal cases). And yes, those drives are great (although I had
to clean/strip the eject mechanisms on mine; I suspect they're prone to
sticking with age). I'm still looking for an Epson dot-matrix printer of
some flavor to complete mine (and some add-on cards would be nice)
Did you do anything to modify the airflow on yours? I think I read
somewhere that they were prone to filling up with dust due to the lack of
filter and fan direction.
Does a non-CP/M box count? The Tatung Einstein? It
runs soemthing called
XtalDOS which is very CP/M-like (I think most of the calls are the same).
I think that was true of Torch CP/N too, wasn't it? Which makes me wonder
how common "almost CP/M" variants were...
For versatility, I guess an S100 machine is desirable.
Not that I was
ever really into that bus.
I've been chasing one for a long time; I just have a thing for
backplane-based systems (and the actual bus doesn't bother me).
cheers
Jules