On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Gene Buckle <geneb at deltasoft.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Jonas Otter wrote:
Seeing that OS X is in some sense Unix-based, I
would say DMR won...
It's not in "some sense", it *IS*.
Absolutely. When I was offered the choice in 2007 between a
work-provided Lenovo Thinkpad (on which I would have run RedHat) or a
MacBook (on which I would have left OS X, unlike some associates I
know), I jumped on the MacBook. I loved it. First thing I had to
fix, though, was putting the Terminal icon in the nav bar.
?It just happens to be saddled with a really weird
window manager and a one button mouse. :)
It works fine with a multi-button mouse, you just can't get one from
the manufacturer. As for the weird window manager, I just used it to
keep track of a couple of browser windows and a thick stack of
terminal sessions. I don't care what color or shape the widgets are -
I just need to close windows, move windows, and open more terminal
sessions. Nearly everything else is irrelevant.
Oh... and to tie in the recent thread on X, I left that MacBook in my
room (this was at the South Pole where we had individual LAN drops for
a personal computer and a VOiP phone) and used it from all over
station by firing up xterms and occasionally browser windows. I _did_
run a session back to North America once or twice, but the bandwidth
and latency (via satellite, sharing a 1Mbps link with everyone else)
made that largely impractical. So I'm an atypical user, but there's
nothing like a thin (or really long) pipe to make you reconsider
fighting with a remote session that slings swaths of pixels around - I
find character-based remote access protocols more appealing and
productive.
-ethan