Seems to me you need to have an expert (of that
particular companies
systems) at the museum to know what to look for to catalog.
I would certainly agree with that. Now without wisshing to start
_another_ flamewar, I would suggest that a lot of people cataloguing
exhibits fore musuems are _not_ computer experts.. Hence some of my
earlier comments.
Somebody else said that cataloguing properly was expensive. I would argue
that the main 'cost' is time -- the actual materials needed are minimal.
What you need is an knowledgable person to check over every machine,
record the options/variants, etc.
But hang on a second. Surely evey newly acquired machine should ne opened
up and inspected anyway/ You want to make sure it doesn't suffer
unnecessary deterioration. For example, mybe there's an internal backup
battery. It sould at least be disconnected so it doesn't go into deep
discharge. PErhaps it should be removed, packed in a leakproof container,
labelled, and kept separately. Many of us have seen the damage that a
leaking PCB-mounted battery can cause :-(.
And to be honest, if you're going to do that, it doesn't take much more
time or knowledge to note down what options are in the machine.
-tony