> C\DERP\: I have to say it's gratifying
to have someone on the list
> that at the least has poked their head inside a monitor (evidently
> Gene has not). I=
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Tony Duell wrote:
Hang on... The other day you called me a
'moron' I think... You can't
have it both ways :-)
Why not? Is poking on's head inside a monitor mutually exclusive with
being a moron?
No, hence the smiley... Much of the time I _am_ a moron...
NB: Tony is not a moron. But he knows more about
monitors, computers, and
electronics in general than anybody else that I know.
Thanks, but that is actually untrue, assuming you know other people on
this list at least as well as you know me.
I was working on monitors ebfore this list even
existed. And I shall
continue to do so. I don;t believe there's any reason not to, the dangers
are much exagerated. In fact the most dangerous voltage you'll meet is
the mains (and possibly rectified mains), something you find in many
other devices too.
OK
I'll stick my head back into one
I didn';t say they were totally safe :-). But a lot of the fears are
unfounded. Modern rimbanded CRTs are unlikely to violently implode unless
they've been tampered with. It is very hard to accidentally come into
contact with the EHT (supply to the final anode), it really ezists only
within the potted flyback transformer, and the cable/conenctor to the
CRT. You are not going to fid it on PCB traces, etc.
The mains is an ever present hazard, of coruse, and one that can easily
be lethal. Many colour monitos use SMPSus with about 350V DC derrived from
the mains, and that is on bare PCB tracks. But you find that in computer
PSUs too, and for some reason I don't find the same reluctance when I
suggest that sombondy has a go at repairing, say, an H777 PSU as I do
when I suggest they do the same to a monitor.
-tony