5 May
2005
5 May
'05
7:58 p.m.
>> I've always wanted to see what Pick
assembly looked like. [...]
> I could pull up some of my old code for you if you want. Pick
> Assembler is quite difficult. Not because [...], but [...].
Sounds deliciously challenging. Gimme. :)
(Seriously, yes, I would be interested in some of your
examples,
mostly just to get a feel for what it could do internally. [...])
And an AOL to all of that from me. I love unusual programming
paradigms. (Not necessarily unusual programming _languages_, like
(say) befunge. That's just an obfuscated representation of a
relatively straightforward machine. I'm talking about things like
INTERCAL (its flow control constructs and unary boolean operators are
the first two things that come to mind) or Icon (generators,
coroutines, etc), Lisp (too many things to list), Prolog (still don't
really have my head around its paradigm)....
Sounds as though Pick assembly would be a worthy item for the list. :)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B