On 9 Dec 2009 at 11:35, Al Kossow wrote:
You probably have more experience with odd formats and
using the
Catweasel. Is there anything you've run into that couldn't be dealt
with using the sample rates on that board? Did you ever experiment
with the sampling rates on double-density data?
I've never run into anything that could be classified as "vintage"
(>20 years old) that couldn't be handled with the original ISA Mk I
board (I do have a MK 3 and a MK 4, but they almost never get used).
The clock rates on the CW are somewhat limited, so I haven't done
much there. Generally, I aim for the shortest interval between
transitions to be about 10-20 clocks, which seems to give adequate
results.
I wonder if there's anything to be gained by using a sample clock
that's a power-of-two multiple of the data rate. It could be argued
that dividing an MFM bit cell into 7 sample intervals rather than 8
would lead to a more accurate center-of-cell reading. My current
project uses a 14.3MHz clock instead of a 16. I'll know more when I
get it running.
The saving grace in all of this floppy business is that, unlike hard
drives, the push was to make floppies physically smaller, while
keeping more-or-less the same capacity. If the same product
development had been followed using hard drives, we might be looking
at 30MB hard drives the size of the head of a pin...
--Chuck