31 Aug
2011
31 Aug
'11
6:52 p.m.
On 08/31/2011 09:34 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
JPEG is an inferior option, especially for pro users, as you know. The
user really is corralled here (and in other cases).
I agree with this 100%, for the same reasons you're aware of.
However, at issue here is whether or not the images will be LOST simply
because they're stored digitally, which is, at this point, all but
impossible.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
This is where Dave's "idiots" argument
is completely cancelled. If your
camera spits out data in an indecipherable format, what choice do you
have? Only to boycott the manufacturer, and that hasn't seemed to work.
*sigh*
I guess you really don't have anything better to do.
What you said might be true if the only way these cameras stored data
was in "RAW" format. Fortunately, this is not the case.