18 Aug
2015
18 Aug
'15
4:09 p.m.
I agree, you really just have to try and run a test through with a
representative page from the document with fine detail and see how it comes
out ... I have found that even fairly fine detail reproduces okay with a
300 DPI scan ... there's no need in scanning with extraneous bit depth and
then you start to get people complaining about file sizes :O
Best,
Sean
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Alexandre Souza <
alexandre.tabajara at gmail.com> wrote:
I have many schematics scanned in 300dpi and they are
great even for a3
printing. Take a lookk at "esquematico de informatica cce" (google it) as
an example...
Em 18/08/2015 10:36, "Tothwolf" <tothwolf at concentric.net> escreveu:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
I certainly feel bitsavers is a good model, and although I'm physically
manuals.
not too far away from the stuff, I'm not sure
I have much to offer other
than disk space on a server for staging.
http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/4695
(previous link: http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/4683 )
The problem I've found with scans is that even at 600 dpi you lose detail
necessary to make use of a lot of the material in these types of manuals
(especially parts designations and values on schematics). It is amazing
just how high the print quality is for many of these 1950s/60s/70s