9 Aug
2013
9 Aug
'13
7:38 p.m.
On 08/09/2013 06:41 PM, Keith Monahan wrote:
@Chuck: I'm certainly in no position to correct
you, but did you mean
125ns here?
You're perfectly correct! Obviously, it makes no sense to compensate by
125 microseconds when the data window is only 4 microseconds!
What's three orders of magnitude anyway? :)
--Chuck