15 Jan
2013
15 Jan
'13
12:57 p.m.
I'm confused by this case. I was under the assumption that anyone that
doesn't pay their bills to a storage locker place faces forfeiture of the
property that is stored there. At least that's how I remember the rental
contract agreement I signed on the storage locker we rented when we
relocated houses.
It seems to also track with what seems to happen on "Storage Wars." I read
the stuff, but I'm confused about how the rental company acted improperly,
but it seems painfully clear that OP was several months behind on rent.
Cliffs?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Bryan Pope <bryan.pope at comcast.net> wrote:
Wow. So if a burglar came into your house and stole
all of your stuff,
then it would be better for him the sell it instead melting it down for
scrap. As least somebody can use it and the thief makes a small profit!
Obviously I should not worry about the infinitely tiny detail that the
stuff was stolen. I feel sooo much better now!
Cheers,
Bryan
On 1/15/2013 12:29 PM, Michael Kerpan wrote:
The way that shady "recycling" outfits
like this work is that they try
to move stuff as quickly as possible and if they can't sell it almost
immediately they WILL melt it down. While the fact that they're making
even a token attempt to sell stuff whole means that they know the
stuff is valuable, you can be pretty sure that if they can't sell the
working systems on their first attempt, they WILL get scrapped. Thus,
by encouraging people not to but this stuff, you are, in effect,
condemning it to a firey death...
Mike