31 Mar
2001
31 Mar
'01
10:56 a.m.
Jeff Hellige skrev:
>The thing is, Microsoft's memory
recommendations tend to be the minimum the
>OS will function correctly. Remember the minimum requirements for win95
>were a 386sx16 and 4 megs of ram. I'm told it will *boot* in that, if
>you're patient. But do useful work? Ha.
I have a Compaq Contura 430C laptop with a
486DX4/100 cpu and
16megs of RAM running Win98 that I used for checking email and stuff
on the road. It's a lesson in patience when trying to do anything
with it. Unfortunately I've never found any larger memory upgrades
for it.
That's odd, I found Win95 to be quite usable on the IBM 486/66 at my father's
house. I wouldn't really want to surf the web on it, but it was fine for
running Paintshop pro, Word and a lot of 8-bit console emulators.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
optimus@dec:foo$ make love
make: don't know how to make love. Stop