----- Original Message -----
From: "R. D. Davis" <rdd(a)rddavis.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: vintage computers and lead poisoning?
Quothe Bryan Pope, from writings of Thu, Jun 03, 2004
at 02:51:23PM -0400:
> While I do agree with you on some parts, I feel that bicycle helmets are
> **VERY** important... A very special friend of mine may have been
severely
injured or not
here right now if she wasn't wearing her bicycle helmet.
She flipped over the front of her bike and smacked the helmet on the
pavement instead of her head.
While such helmets may save some people's lives, although their use
may result in some people being croaked in some instances, should not
the decision to wear them be up to the individual, not the government?
What's next, laws prohibiting children from climbing trees or adults
from using power tools or working on electrical/electronic equipment
without taking special classes and becoming certified?
Depends on who is paying the hospital bills. If it's the state, as in
Canadian taxes, then I'm for helmets and belts. (Belts are now enforced in
all 50 states aren't they?) There used to be a campaign here, started by a
doctor who saw too many 'stupid' injuries in young people. Simply said, the
campaign asks where you draw your stupid line. Rehabs and wheelchairs are
full of people who might redraw their line if they had a second chance.
But I think in the States, if you fall off your bike and crack your own
skull you can sue the pavement people for making it too hard. That makes
more sense than forcing people to wear helmets and do up seatbelts.
Absolutely no one should be able to force common sense on us.
Copyright (C) 2004 R. D. Davis The difference between
humans & other
animals:
All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief
that we're above Nature
&
her other creatures,
using dogma to justify
such
www.rddavis.org 410-744-4900 beliefs and to justify
much human cruelty.