IBM 360/30 in verilog (was: How do they make Verilog code for unknown ICs?)

On Jul 11, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Camiel Vanderhoeven <iamcamiel at gmail.com> wrote: And I'm very close to having a 360/65 in VHDL. Op 11 jul. 2016 2:44 a.m. schreef "Curious Marc" <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>: > And Carl Claunch has an IBM 1130 in VHDL. > Marc > > Sent from my iPad > >>> On Jul 10, 2016, at 10:23 PM, Lawrence Wilkinson <ljw-cctech at ljw.me.uk> >> wrote: >> >> That'll be me, I guess, It's in VHDL. URL in sig. >> >>> On 10/07/16 15:21, Paul Birkel wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Guy > Sotomayor Jr >>> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:04 PM >>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts >>> Subject: Re: How do they make Verilog code for unknown ICs? >>> >>> What you can do (and I?ve seen it done) is define verilog modules that > provide the functions of the IC and use that in their designs. I?ve seen > at least two interesting classic computer recreations using this approach > (re-implemenation of the CADR lisp machine in verilog and an IBM 360/30 in > verilog). >>> >>> ROMs are easy (just instantiate a lookup table). PLCs are just > combinatorial equations which are relatively easy with the verilog ?assign? > statement. >>> >>> TTFN - Guy >>> >>> ====****==== >>> >>> Do you have a pointer to that "IBM 360/30 in Verilog", Guy? >>> >>> ----- >>> paul >> >> -- >> Lawrence Wilkinson lawrence at ljw.me.uk >> The IBM 360/30 page http://www.ljw.me.uk/ibm360 >