For example,
if my "8G" microdrive were 8G of CF instead, [...]
takes over 9.7 years to transfer 2PB
My understanding is the cycle count relates
to writing to a given
block. For use as a swap device or other heavy rewrite-in-place
device, the 250K writes could be used up in a matter of weeks.
That's why I said that in the context of devices which did their own
wear leveling: mutating the mapping between blocks as seen by the host
and blocks in the underlying flash so as to spread the writes around is
what wear leveling _is_.
Does CF as working storage even approach the
reliability of a floppy?
If the floppy was made recently, /dev/null approaches the reliability
of a floppy. :(
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B