24 Jul
2008
24 Jul
'08
10:11 a.m.
bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca wrote:
Jules Richardson wrote:
I think Al's point is the leech is SELLING copies of the files on CD/DVD
- that is doubly offensive as the seller has no permission, nor is
he/she giving credit to bitsavers for doing the scanning in the first
place. Now if the cost of the CDs was made as a donation to Bitsavers
(ducking)...
Bitsavers is mirrored to a number of sites - with appropriate credits -
that do not charge either. I have no trouble refinding Bitsavers when
doing a search on the 'net - if I've lost it in amongst way too many
bookmarks...
John :-#)#
Al Kossow wrote:
Well it can't hurt to have duplicates. I tend to find bitsavers nice
but hard to find stuff if you don't know where to look.
leeched from bitsavers
Thanks for the heads-up - I was just about to bookmark their site!