15 May
2002
15 May
'02
1:01 p.m.
"Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" wrote:
The 4004 was once rumored to have been named that
because it had the
equivalent of 4004 transistors.
THAT is what probably gave rise to the 68000 silliness.
It's MUCH more impressive what was done with only 486!
Shoudn't that read "80486"?
--
Andreas Freiherr
Vishay Semiconductor GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
http://www.vishay.com