Quadra 660AV what's with the "PowerPC" label?

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Liam Proven wrote: He claimed to be the original owner, and he was a teacher. He probably got it as part of some educational program, maybe it was used then. I dunno. Maybe it was at a school that had a lot of macs and they robbed a case cover from a dead one. It's weird, but I'm okay with weird. I still haven't either. I've got it, and I'm dorking around trying to get my hardware straight (still waiting on AAUI 10BT dongles and a few other bits of kit). Fortunately, it's easy to get a hold on from places like Mac Garden, et al. They have ISOs for NextSTEP and OpenSTEP, too. I'd like to try those on my Quadra 700. I just ordered an extra SCSI2SD for that guy. PS: I like the word "kit" to describe "gear". I hope I'm using it right. I also prefer "grey" over "gray". I hope you British folks don't mind an American bootlegging those terms. Oh, and I'm drinking some Earl Grey. :-) I like emulators for "helping" with real hardware. Ie.. making disks or disk images, transferring files, etc.. However, I'm with you, emulators aren't as fun. They are awesome tools, and they are *some* fun, just not as much as the real thing for me. Well, you guys had Acorn and I never got to play with those, much. Shame that there wasn't more import/export of such things, since more is better. :-) I can't really back up that position, but I totally agree. Not that I have anything "against" OSX. It at least doesn't have an identity-complex that Linux does. It's just it's own thing. They have SUS and UNIX 03 standards conformance, but they don't pretend like they are focused on being a UNIX variant. Apple just goes it's own way and everyone hopes for the best. It's GUI is just it's own unique creation with some very loose visual (and strong code-based) connections back to NeXTSTEP, and has a quality and value all it's own. Linux+systemd desperately wants to be Windows nowadays but adherents still get offended when UNIX purists frown at their "unification" efforts (ala systemd and others) which de-emphasize KISS, small-is-beautiful, make everything a filter, etc... Linux wants to cop that cool, without any binding respect towards the UNIX philosophy. Linux seems the most engaged in the "re-invent it poorly" activity that is so emblematic of why a lot of folks are leaving. Most technologists I know who were long time Linux users are now fleeing to BSD or elsewhere. I read someone say recently of OSX, BSD, and Linux: "Where does Linux belong? OSX makes a far superior workstation and BSD is better on servers. Why do I need Linux again?" I very much agree with the spirit of those questions. That's one thing I liked about IRIX. It's still a true UNIX variant, not "based on UNIX". The GUI is old-looking and primitive by today's standards, but still I think they struck a nice balance or at least one that appeals to me, personally. When it comes to GUI operating systems, I want them to drink the whole bottle of GUI kool-aid. Classic MacOS did that, IMHO. It was totally a desktop OS and didn't try to bifurcate to also make a good server. Hence, Apple turning to A/UX and AIX back in those days for servers. Do you normally just find free stuff or grab folks cast-off items ? The stuff I find cool is too rare and too many other geeks liked. I paid about $150 for the Quadra 700 recently. Most were selling well above that level, but mine didn't have a HDD included (no big deal with SCSI2SD, baby). I see B&W Macs on Craigslist a lot and for cheap. I want a machine of that generation, too. However, I haven't decided which one, yet. The only PPC box that ever caught my eye was the G4 cube. I see a lot of those on Ebay, but I'm kind of waiting to catch one locally. I too used Linux from 1993 to about 1997. Then, the more I learned about BSD, the more I liked it. Hordes were flooding in to use Linux by then, so I bailed out. I haven't really run Linux as a workstation since then. I'm a current RHCE and I still interact with Linux a ton at my job, but there is little joy in it. I find myself pursing my lips and shaking my head a lot while fixing systemd problems or working on some dirty PoS of a JBOSS server. It was a nice well when it was first dug, but now it's fouled by too many people and too much toxic admixture. There is so much "free stuff" online these days for M68k Macs. You can get just about _anything_ you ever remembered or wanted and it's all considered "abandonware". For me, these "productivity" programs don't change much. A word processor from 1993 is just as good for my purposes as one from 2016. Photoshop still has layers and channels in 5.5, etc.. It sure can be. It's made worse by the stupid stupid fact that Apple's disk utilities don't recognize non-Apple devices without a patch. There are a lot of chicken & egg problems to solve until you can get that FTP client installed. Then it's smooth sailing. :-) AAUI == Pita. Yet another ugly dongle, too, ugh. I got a Farallon Nubus ethernet card for the Quadra because of this. Unless I'm dealing with fiber, I hate AUIs, MAUs, etc... ADB == Not too big of a deal since KB & mice are still plentiful. However, it's disappointing that there aren't easily accessible converters for PS/2 and USB. RGB == Another PITA, but at least VGA HD15 converters are cheap and work well. Those sound a lot easier to cope with. If it wasn't for my love for the 68k, I'd have probably gone that direction, too. Like I said before, I'll probably still get one just to use as a "bridge" for the older gear. Maybe I can get a cheap G4 laptop and avoid sucking up too much more space in my retrolab. Yep. I agree. Perhaps getting too used to the older interface and dynamics pre-biased me. That would be great. Did you hear about Apple making the marketing change of my brain still dreamed that Apple would license the classic MacOS to a hobbyist shop to continue with new releases etc.. That would have made things a lot more interesting in the 1990s. Windows seems pretty unassailable, but the public can be fickle. I've always wondered why companies don't make operating systems for free, then sell licensing rights, partner deals, driver development, etc... Either you can't make enough $$$ that way, or the draw of charging for the OS is just too lucrative. I'm not sure which it is. -Swift