Domestic consumer-level audio gear doesn't have balanced connections for
the simple reason that like much else in Our World of Technology, audio
came out of the vacuum tube era when things were a lot more expensive - and
balanced circuits require essentially twice the active & passive circuitry,
wiring & switching, which increases the costs. These days, it's not such a
big deal, but back when tubes were the only game going, it was real money
(and space!) to double the tube complement.
That, and proper balanced lines require low impedances - and about the only
way to manage that with tubes is to use coupling transformers, which are
also quite expensive if you want real bandwidth and linearity. So
single-ended was the thing, and since the newer solid-state world had to
get along well with the huge installed base of legacy tube gear, they stuck
with SE designs.
And while single-ended lines have their own inherent shortcomings, what
really sucks is that the idiot RCA connector - introduced sometime in the
30s - became the universal standard. Just about anything would be an
improvement - heck, BNC would be superb for audio, and it's not like the
connectors are all that much more expensive once the machinery is rolling
them out by the thousands.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
But in
general, unless I know there's a reason for a high cable price
(exceptional craftsmanship for cables that are going to take a lot of
abuse, for example), I get suspicious if I'm paying more than about $10
I've worked iwth (and inside) measuring instruments accurate to at least
6 figures. They never use exotic cables :. When the likes of Tek,
HP/Agilent/whoevber_they_are_now, LeCroy, etc start using these odd
techniques that are claimed ot improve sound in audio systems I will
start to take notice...
-tony