Ethan Dicks wrote:
I don't know about the state of your drive, Bob,
but mine is merely
missing a cartridge so I can't spin up the fixed platter.
I've got cartridges, but I really, really, (_really_!) doubt that it'll
make your drive work. RC25s were notoriously unreliable even when they were
new, and as unsealed (even the fixed platter is open to the air) drives they
just don't age well at all. I've got two RC25 drives (well, maybe even
three but that's another story) and none will work. I spent a couple of
weeks working on them once, and all will now try to spin up and then fault
with various error conditions (I've since forgotten the error codes -
sorry).
Every once in a while, I entertain the
idea of turning old COMBOARDs into some form of disk controller (IDE
or SCSI would be the easiest),
Another option would be to build something that plugs into the LESI (aka
Aztec) controller and pretends to be a disk. That'd be way cool. But I've
never seen any documentation on the LESI interface, either electrical or the
protocol, so I've no idea how hard that would be. As long as the interface
remains undocumented, I'd guess "really hard". And of course the LESI
interface wasn't very popular (it was only ever used for the TU81 and the
RC25) so the potential market, outside of you and me, is limited :-)
The important thing is that whatever you come up with has to be close
enough to a standard MSCP controller so that you can boot it with the
standard DU bootstrap and so that VMB can talk to it. Unfortunately some of
the third party SMD controllers weren't really MSCP compatible and needed
custom bootstraps and VMS drivers (we used to have an SI controller on a 780
that fell into this category) - those would be a problem unless a) you can
also recover the software (difficult), and b) they supported a 11/730 (even
more unlikely!). The LESI approach at least avoids this problem.
Of course if you only want to run Un*x then you have more flexibility :-)
Bob