Fred Cisin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Jules Richardson wrote:
The collection we were offered is/was pretty
complete - issue 1 to the present
day, with just a few missing; the problem is that it's a huge about of storage
space for something that would very rarely be required as a reference, and
there are more important machine/manufacturer-specific things needing shelf
space.
Do you have a copy of "dBase2 v the bilge pump"?
Do you have a copy of Osborne's "The guy on the left"?
Do you have a copy of World Power System's ads?
Do you have a copy of the Otrona "little tramp" ad?
Do you have a copy of the IBM converable '57 Chevy ad?
Do you have a copy of the Apple ad "welcoming" IBM?
Do you have a copy of the Lisa ads?
How many truly memorable early ads can you recall?
I'm actually wondering now - given the websites and comments from a couple in
this thread, it seems like there might be two magazines with the same name.
Ain't life complicated at times...
The UK one (which is the one the museum's been offered) was well known for
being very full of ads - with not much in the way of actual useful journalism
- but that doesn't really rule out it being the one you're alluding to (I
don't think I ever read it prior to 1990 or so, so I never got to see it in
the glory days of computing)
FWIW though, it is difficult to decide what to accept and what not. If space
was infinite, it'd be accepted and all go onto archive shelving and be there
"just in case", but in the real world that's just not practical :-( It's
logical to me for a computer museum to be first port of call when it comes to
researchers looking for computer magazines - but at the same time the
anticipated demand for advertising-heavy "generic" computing magazines in
comparison to other printed material out there is anticipated to be extremely
low.
Having them in scanned form would at least preserve the information "just in
case" whilst not taking up physical space - but it'd be a heck of a scanning
effort (I'm not even convinced they'd go through a sheet-fed scanner actually,
the paper was so thin and clay-heavy).
cheers
Jules