On 2/21/07, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
At 01:02 PM 2/21/2007, you wrote:
There's an even *more* interesting paper on
this from a CMU post-doc
(math warning...lots of statistics) that seems to blow
away many (if not
all) assumptions about drive failures/quality/raid/etc.
I saw this a few days ago but thought I shouldn't post because
it would be off-topic.
- John
Indeed...and I was criticized for posting a OT thread on this list before
and here comes a OT thread that is openly discussed...what gives??? Why was
I flamed while this guy is not? I just don't get it...:(