-------------Original Message:
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Discussion of large systems
No matter how you cut it, sorting on tape beat sorting cards on unit
record equipment...
Cheers,
Chuck
--------------Reply:
Mind you, an 082/083 sorter with cards feeding across and dropping into
their compartments is as much a part of the "old computer" image as
spinning tape reels...
And considering the cost of CPU time and the fact that input data was
still on punched cards in most cases, it was usually more efficient and
cost-effective to still sort the cards off-line and then copy/merge to/with
tape.
Ah, fond memories of carrying stacks of 5-6000 cards across the room
to the collator (or, later, the high-speed card reader), not to mention the
inevitable day when you bumped into someone and scattered half a
megabyte of data across the data centre floor and under the machinery;
now _that_'s fragmentation!
m