> Mind sharing that manual? :o) I like your
line of tought, but imagine a
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Tony Duell wrote:
A little hard with no scanenr :-).
Which is why we keep trying to give you one!
Howzbout:
We send you one of our scanners to "check out" for us.
(BUT, only until we get our manual for it :-)
You could use it, test it, try it out, run it now and then
(to keep the mechanism from freezing up:-)
and then we'll get it back from you,
just as soon as scanners start including manuals.
service manual
for a simple thing like a mouse ;o)
quicker just to trace out the scheamtic than to
do battle trying to get a
schemaitc from the manufactuer. I know I included schematics of the
appropriate mice when I traced out diagrams for the PERQ AGW3300 and the
HP IPC>
I thought that maybe I could get away with that logic to get you to
accept
a scanner :-)
BTW, one important spec for mice would be the diameter of the ball, that
lUsers keep losing.
And I still fail to see how supplying information
means I'll do a worse
repair. Darn it, I am going to have a go at fixing this <foo> no matter
what. If I can get a service manual I'll read it first, if not, I'll have
to work it out as I go along...
I think that his argument (which I don't agree with), was that possession
of information would give people a false sense of confidence to attempt
tasks for which they weere not qualified.
Is that so? Or does that speak badly for the quality of the information?
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com