23 Sep
2001
23 Sep
'01
7:37 a.m.
Tony Duell wrote:
<snip>
True, the code is most definitely Pentium machine
code. But IMHO it can
also be considered to be the _microcode_ for the emulated PDP11 CPU.
Which happens to use a Pentium as its microengine. As I've said several
times, this is a very unconventional way to consider it, but I still
don't think it's wrong.
Ok Tony,
Its unconventional, I agree. All I was saying is that your not using the term microcode
in
the 'correct' way, which is to say using the conventional meaning of the term.
So incorrect is not wrong then.
I give up.