I'm sorry to bring this up (I know I'm being a
stick in the mud)
but can we take this topic off the list.
I find this very on-topic,
Nah,
gotta disagree jim. This is talk of current apples, and
certainly isn't on topic at this point.
As the person whose post was, apparently, the straw that pushed people
into speaking up...I didn't intend to be talking about Apples, current
or not, so mcuh as about construction quality (which is timeless),
pointing out that proper construction (versus lack thereof) can make
two machines with matching paper specs be worth wildly differing
amounts. Macs came into it only as the case at hand.
Or at least that was how I saw it. I obviously didn't make that clear
enough, or the issue this blew up into wouldn't've arisen.
My apologies.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
