12 Dec
2010
12 Dec
'10
5:38 p.m.
On 06/12/10 08:00, Eric Smith wrote:
Philip Pemberton wrote:
Yeah, sure. But it might be easier to re-scan the documentation!
Yes, there are *that* *many* errors.... Even the test code in the
Diagnostics chapter is worthless -- missing code lines, incorrect hex
code (seriously, a stack-push in a piece of code that's meant to kick
off a sector read?!)
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
My "annotated edition" corrects about a
dozen minor and
major errors in the register set descriptions, and adds a bunch
of informational sticky-notes and scribbly comments to reinforce
certain points.
At some point when you have spare time, could you transcribe the
corrections and comments and post them?