I think that Julian was referring to it "getting through" to cctech, not
cctalk.
Pat
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Evan Koblentz wrote:
This "crap" SHOULD get through. It's a
perfectly okay example of
something that's off-topic but still related to historic technology.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Wolfe (FireflyST) [mailto:fireflyst at
earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:16 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only
Subject: Re: youtube movie of making a vacuum triode.
This is precisely the reason I unsubscribed from cctalk and
subscribed to cctech. Yet, crap like this still gets through. Suck.
-----Original Message-----
>From: jpero at sympatico.ca
>Sent: Jan 8, 2008 12:53 PM
>To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
>Subject: youtube movie of making a vacuum triode.
>
>This is in french but the video is priceless! 17 minutes long.
>Worth taking your favorite drink and take a seat.
>
>http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/01/make_your_own_vaccum_tube.h
>t ml
>
>Cheers, Wizard