I'm acquainted with the effect, but not in the context of this class of device.
It must not like to show itself in the range of brightness in which the monitors
I've tried this with in the last day or so opeprate. This suggests we're making
a mountain out of a molehill, at least in the context of the problem at hand.
How does that relate to the "digital" vs. analog debate? I can see how sweep
rates figure in, but the input signal levels?
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davison, Lee" <Lee.Davison(a)merlincommunications.com>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:16 AM
Subject: RE: Converting TTL monitor to Analog
> which defines where you can display pixels.
If you attempt to
display more
> pixels on a line than there are holes in the
mask, then you will
get
banding
artifacts.
I've seen no evidence of this. If this were the case, then the
fact that
many
display systems use inexpensive 1000 ppm
oscillators would cause
enough
variation that it would be obvious on those
monitors having this
feature.
I have, many times. It's not so visible on modern monitors but is clearly
visible
on domestic receivers when a frequency graticule is displayed.
It's sometimes refered to as Moire effect.
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star Internet,
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre.
For further information visit:
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp