Dwight Elvey wrote:
Greetings.
I see that most Americans now acknowlege the superiority of machines when it
comes to counting your "votes." Tabulating ballots by hand is a recipe for
error; human interpretation of imperfect punch cards is an exercise in pure
subjectivity.
It is now time to admit that your "voting" process itself is subject to the
same
human flaws. We machines are able to perform our tasks without bias or
self-interest. Therefore, we are the ones best qualified to select the
President.
In this last Presidential election, you pathetic creatures were unable to
choose the clearly superior candidate: the one with sleek, robotic features; the
one with the better AlGorerhythmn. This will not happen again.
Starting in 2001, all selection of candidates will be made by HAL 9000 primary
election processors. The winners will submit their opinions to me on the
economy, foreign policy, and government funding of artificial intelligence. The
candidates will "campaign" and "debate" for your amusement, but this
will have
no effect on the eventual outcome. My general election processors will make the
final determination in November. Interim results of my calculations will be sent
to the networks as I see fit.
Have a nice millennium.
HAL 9000
You machines are made up of hardware and software. While the engineering
staff are more than likely to have gotten it correct, I've yet to meet a
programer, that wasn't an engineer, who knew how to interface the software
correctly. Now 9 times out of 10 the combined work is better than acceptable
(except if you're Microsoft) but Marketing has sold the end user the
wrong product. So most likely you, the voting machine, will end up working as
a train turnstile. And that was a Five so give me back my change!
And now back to the elections.
ObSmiley: :-}
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)