8 May
2010
8 May
'10
7:31 p.m.
On May 8, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
Yes, me too. As long as nobody asks either of us "why". We KNOW
that it's a 32-bit processor, but as we've proven over the past few
days, it's not easy to quantify exactly why.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Jim, I really
believe this just isn't as cut-and-dried as you say
it is.
I guess not!
But I reserve the right to smack anyone with a large salmon caught
describing an 80386sx as a 16-bit processor.