11 Aug
2016
11 Aug
'16
11:26 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred
Cisin
Sent: 11 August 2016 16:38
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Spam [was Re: still looking for that stuff?]
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, geneb wrote:
Firstly, there are many types of unwanted e-mail, and using the term SPAM to
cover them all is a dis-service.
A lot of reported SPAM simply comes from lists folks have signed up to, and
who can't be bothered to un-sign themselves off the list.
The e-mail in question was not one of those, it was almost certainly sent by
a criminal attempting to steal and re-sell some ones credentials.
I am fairly certain the e-mail originated from 102.47.65.89. Sticking that
into an Internet Search engine reports...
IP General Information
IP Address: 103.47.65.89
Hostname: 103.47.65.89
ISP: Zapbytes Technologies Pvt.
Geolocation Information
Continent: Asia (AS)
Country: India (IN) IN
City: Delhi
Latitude: 28.6667 (28?40'0.12" N), Longitude: 77.2167 (77?13'0.12" N)
I think it would be more effective to stuff the
spammer into a Brazen
Bull and then force his children/family members to light the fire.
Televise it across all media outlets. Spam should slow to a tiny,
tiny, trickle after one or two of these little events...
Spam should reduce when word gets around that spammers
are being
tortured to death.
I doubt it, some one will invent a religion that says tortured spammers get
to heaven first......
Decriminalize spammercide.
Spread the word - "spammers are already being murdered."
Dave
G4UGM