Tony Duell wrote:
I really don't understand the love of Sinclair
products. IU'd much rather
have nad use something DEC or HP, or one of the many other companies that
didn't cut every possible corner and then some impossible ones. But then
collectores are often strange.
I suppose the name Sinclair is closely tied to the early days of the
home computer boom, and at least in the UK people will think of his
products before the likes of Commodore or Apple.
Plus as Sridhar said, one of his machines was often the first that many
of us owned (it was in my case, which was why I hung onto my Sinclair
collection for a long time after I really needed the space it took up :)
Plus Sinclair always had that whacky mad scientist air about him which
makes his stuff appealing.
I suppose the thing about Sinclair stuff is that it was cheap - but it
was obviously cheap, so you knew pretty much what you were getting.
Compare to machines with similar capabilities of the time and quite
often they weren't really much better in terms of what users wanted -
but the packaging was a lot slicker and hence the price was a lot higher...
cheers
Jules