There are some
inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
experimentally).
One remark here. The TPS numbers not always seem to be "logical". Please
notice,
that a lot of the benchmark is influenced by the I/o & disk system. So a
faster CPU not always
has a better TPS number. You can see it many times if you really look
into it.
That's true, but the /90A has quite a bit more cache, which should
influence the TPS rating.
And, the 4000/90 & /90a are workstations. So TPS
is not of so much value
to this ...
There's also a lot of holes in the list.
So fill them ;-)
I was planning on doing that in the next few days. Standardizing will
take a bit of work, though.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at
http://www.dittman.net/